Joe Finnegan is not afraid of animals. At least not personally.
But as Vice President of the entertainment division of the insurer Fireman’s Fund, he was worried when he saw what director Sean Penn’s eye for Into the Wild - entering the film released last year on d a young man who leaves his middle class are living and trekking in Alaska to be one with nature.
In addition to the film is potentially dangerous projectiles between cliffs and water fowl fast, Penn needs a bear.
“Wild animals are regarded as” outstanding “for a reason,” Finnegan said. “If people, anything can happen. There is an old adage underwriting in the world: horses and players do not mix.
That is why the largest insurer of Hollywood movies - in an annual exercise fun to attract attention, the eve of Sunday’s Academy Awards - as the risk game film of the year 2007.
When it comes to opportunities, but only a few Tinseltown most important and unusual betting on the small army of insurance mathematicians, studios and donors provide from any number of potentially devastating losses .
Most independent producers and even some major studios is not a film, unless it is insured against potential problems, including manufacturing delays injured or disabled actor, bad weather, failure of ‘equipment or damage to essential elements of a film.
On a band with a budget of $ 100 million production, which are often potential blockbusters: “If a player receives a sick day and was unable to capitalize, it’s a $ 1 million state,” said Finnegan. “It is not profitable, Low-exposure. It may be very great danger. ”
Best of coverage may be omitted in about 1% on a film’s budget and covers a tax deductible equal to one day’s worth of shooting. Major Studios often buy an annual policy, on several films and complement, especially if a film needs special attention.
Independent Films, this policy needs to land another form of protection, as the conclusion of loans, to compensate survivors men, if the film is not on time and within budget. These loans can be used for another of a film than 2% of costs.
Supplier “is not a James Bond film, no insurance,” said Gene Williams, World Wide Entertainment Commercial Manager for Chubb Insurance. “But it is very often used for a film yet unrelated insurance.”
It takes a lot of experience in evaluating the potential risks of a film, which is why only a handful of companies competing for the estimated $ 200 million Hollywood spends each year on premiums. In addition to the Allianz Group (AZ) Fireman’s Fund, Chubb includes major suppliers (CB), travelers (TRV) and HCC Insurance Holdings (HCC).
The report is a general rule, tailored for each production and changes affecting the whole of the entertainment industry.
This month, Fireman’s Fund conducted its first policy to protect some producers, if the Screen Actors Guild strike continues, a possibility at the end of June.
In addition, Chubb in the coverage this week for problems that arise after the first lathe work ends, as the destruction of hard drives for storing digital images, computer viruses and communication breakdowns. “It was an update for a long time and the end is a revolutionary change that we originally planned,” said Williams.
A delay in the computer today, expensive effects and the small pool of programmers, know-how, costs hundreds of thousands of dollars a day, “he said.
Insurers must also iron nerves to develop strategies for certain stars, are known for their unpredictable behavior and attention too lax health.
“An actor, to and from rehabilitation and the history of a problem on the board of a quantity of money and a fairly strong right to deduct,” Finnegan said.
Because his company, we must go all covered with a medical examination, “I know that the reliability of each actor in the economy.”
One possible exception is Robert De Niro: Fireman’s Fund continued the star of taxi drivers in 2006, claims falsely that his health during the year 2003. He was diagnosed with prostate cancer, two days after filing the request, a medical certificate from the insurance company and three days after submitting a biopsy. The diagnosis led to four months late in adapting Hide and Seek, and a distribution rate of more than $ 1.8 million.